![]() Michio Kaku, the physicist and popular author, put it like this: “Today, your cell phone has more computer power than all of NASA back in 1969, when it placed two astronauts on the moon.”īut these just-so sayings obscure the real power of the Apollo computer. Now, if you compare the computing power that NASA used with any common device, from a watch to a greeting card to a microwave, it induces technological vertigo. The trends that this computer foretold kept spinning out, exponentially, for decades: From big to small, from vacuum tubes to silicon, from hardware to software. Computers had been the size of rooms and filled with vacuum tubes, and if the Apollo computer, at 70 pounds, was not exactly miniature yet, it began “the transition between people bragging about how big their computers are … and bragging about how small their computers are,” the MIT aerospace and computing historian David Mindell once joked in a lecture. The Apollo Guidance Computer, in both its guises-one on board the core spacecraft, and the other on the lunar module-was a triumph of engineering. ![]() The calculations required to make in-flight adjustments and the complexity of the thrust controls outstripped human capacities. ![]() ![]() A pilot could never have navigated the way to the moon, as if a spaceship were simply a more powerful airplane. Without the computers on board the Apollo spacecraft, there would have been no moon landing, no triumphant first step, no high-water mark for human space travel. Editor's Note: This article is part of a series reflecting on the Apollo 11 mission, 50 years later. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |